ALTERNATIVE ADHESIVE TECHNOLOGIES
IN THE FOAM
FURNITURE AND BEDDING INDUSTRIES: A CLEANER
TECHNOLOGIES SUBSTITUTES ASSESSMENT
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Pollution Prevention Technology
Design for the Environment Program
Prepared by:
Michael Morris and Katy Wolf
Institute for Research and Technical Assistance
Mary B. Swanson
Jack R. Geibig
Kerry Kelly
University of Tennessee,
Center for Clean Air Products and Clean Technologies
The
Design for the Environment (DfE) Program in EPA’s Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) is a voluntary, cooperative program that
works in partnership with industry to develop and distribute pollution
prevention and environmental and human health risk information on alternative
chemicals, processes, and products. The DfE approach uses cleaner technologies
substitutes assessments (CTSAs) to evaluate the performance, cost, and
environmental and human health impacts of competing technologies. A
CTSA is a compilation of considerations and reference materials related
to available and emerging technologies in a given industrial sector.
The aim of the CTSA is to assist businesses in making more informed
decisions that fit their situation.
The
foam fabrication, upholstered furniture manufacturing, and mattress
manufacturing industries rely heavily on adhesives throughout their
operations. Many of these companies are small businesses. Historically,
the adhesives used by these industries were based on 1,1,1-trichloroethane
(TCA), an ozone-depleting substance. When production of TCA was banned,
these industries generally converted to adhesives based on methylene
chloride (METH), a suspect carcinogen. The Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) developed a very stringent regulation on METH
which became effective for most METH users in April, 2000. Most companies
could not meet the new worker exposure limits without a substantial
investment in ventilation equipment. As a result, nearly all companies
plan to convert away from METH-based adhesives. Various types of alternative
adhesives are available and the businesses need guidance on their cost,
performance and relative risks so they can select the alternative that
is best for their operation. This project provides the comparative information
on the adhesive alternatives.
This
document contains an overall summary of the Furniture Adhesives CTSA
project and results. More detailed information can be found in Volume
1: Cost and Performance Evaluation, which describes cost and performance
of the adhesive technologies, and in Volume 2: Risk Screening and Comparison,
which presents comparative risk information. Volume 2 of the document
is available as a link http://eerc.ra.utk.edu/ccpct/aap1.html
Downloads